CONDUIT vs. PEEK Cages
Brief description of study
Primary Objective: To determine if CONDUIT and PEEK +rhBMP-2 cages produce similar clinical and radiographic outcomes in patients undergoing direct lateral Interbody fusion Secondary Objective: To determine if CONDUIT and PEEK + rhBMP-2 cages are comparable with regards to cost The primary study endpoint will be the difference in fusion rates and ODI scores between patients who get the PEEK + rh-BMP-2 cage and those who get the CONDUIT cage. The secondary study endpoints will be additional radiographic outcomes: subsidence rates and heterotopic ossification/osteolysis. The secondary study endpoints will also include clinical outcomes such as complications, readmissions, adverse events, other patient-reported outcomes (EQ5D, VAS, PROMIS), and costs associated with the PEEK and CONDUIT cages.
Eligibility of study
You may be eligible for this study if you meet the following criteria:
- Conditions: Medical Research
-
Age: - 99 Years
-
Gender: All
TBD
Find a site
,
You have contacted , on
Your message has been sent to the study team at ,
What happens next?
- You can expect the study team to contact you via email or phone in the next few days.
- Sign up as volunteer to help accelerate the development of new treatments and to get notified about similar trials.
You are contacting